OSM Network

OSM load speed: server vs remote client.

OSM load throughput vs client–server link rate

The network study uses an R9 9950X client loading onto an i5-13600K server while throttling the link from 100Mb/s through 10Gb/s. Dotted reference lines show the same server with a host-local client (646 kNodes/s nodes, 274 kNodes/s index). Even at 10Gb/s, index build on the remote client (208 kNodes/s) stays below that i5 host-local baseline; node loading reaches 666 kNodes/s, in line with the on-server client. Below 2.5Gb/s, both phases degrade—the 100Mb/s case drops to 90 kNodes/s.

Comparing host-local results across different CPUs (for example R9 vs i5) is not apples-to-apples here; a fair cross-system claim would need matched client/server hardware or bidirectional remote tests in both directions.

Regenerate: python3 reports/osm-network-speed.py (reads docs/results-summary/pg18/osm-network.md).

Snapshot of the Streamlit explorer — down between releases (OSM Network) on 2026-08-09. Captured by explorer/snapshot-streamlit.py from the live site.

Query returned 9 rows.

client server conn nodes_kips index_kips wal_mbps
Apple M4 Max 128GB Apple AP2048Z Apple M4 Max host 463.0 273.0 12.8
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB Apple M4 Max Studio 10000 614.0 303.0 16.9
R9 9950X 124GB SK51 2TB R9 9950X host 758.0 366.0 21.2
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB i5-13600K 10000 666.0 208.0 18.4
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB i5-13600K 5000 625.0 245.0 17.3
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB i5-13600K 2500 505.0 204.0 14.7
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB i5-13600K 1000 428.0 204.0 12.4
R9 9950X 128GB SK51 2TB i5-13600K 100 90.0 122.0 2.6
i5-13600K 188GB Fury G5 4TB i5-13600K host 646.0 274.0 17.8

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.